Andrea Arnold’s FISH TANK and WASP

 Andrea Arnold is an acclaimed director. We have studied two of her films during our course: Wasp (a short film winning an oscar in 2005) and Fish Tank. Both of which represent social realism, therefore it applies to our work fairly well. It is interesting to know that she grew up as the eldest of fouur children in a council house in Dartford. This could be the reason and inspiration behind her award winning, short film Wasp, and even the ideas behind that of Fish Tank.

This is a screen shot from Wasp. I really enjoyed watching this film because it represented a rough environment and gave you some idea of what it is actually like. The fact that there was nothing majorly obvious about it that lead you to believe that it was a filmn (there was no soundtrack for example, all the sound was diegetic), it was more like glimpsing into the life of a single mother, living on a council estate with four kids as opposed to an oscar winning film, it is so realistic. Everything about it was believable. What is in a way, quite sad about it, is the way in which the young kids appear to be growing up so quickly. This is the same in Fish Tank. The kids, aged 10/11 are seen swearing like nobody’s business, and also smoking cigarettes. This is quite a wake up call; both of these films was deemed to be over exploititive of this type of environment, this, however, suggests that this is the norm, and- sadly- that it happens all over.

The idea of the ‘chav’  is seen here, but it is almost as if Arnold is trying to find something beautiful within the harsh social realism. Mia, (the daughter) in this film is a loud mouthed girl who is keen to stick up for herself and stand her ground, she comes across as being unemotional and hardfaced, but as the plot develops, we see that she is vulnerable and naive and this provides us with a different interpretation on (this sounds awful, but…) that ‘kind’ of people. The constant underage drinking re-iterates that of the picture below, but there is definitely a softer side that comes through:

here are some personal quotes from Andrea Arnold herself:

Personal Quotes

[Accepting her Oscar for “Wasp”] “As we say in England, this is the ‘dogs bollocks’.”

“Dramatically, I like darkness, I like conflict – but I don’t see the world as defined by them. And why would I pretend to? That’s not who I am.”

Mainly it’s just real life around me that inspires me. I see someone on the bus, and I want to write about them. But among filmmakers, I suppose Tarkovsky. He has something spiritual about him. His book ‘Sculpting in Time’ is on my bedside table.

No matter what happens to you in your life, all around you there are amazing things.

How is Social Realism portrayed in Fish Tank?

To be fair, you don’t really know what an environment is really like until you experience it first hand, but judging on the traditional stereotype of what a council estate is like and the people that live in them, this film gives you some idea of what it’s like, that of which is not hard to believe. Also, on a macro scale, the narrative and plot contribute to the naturilistic and realistic feel of the film. When you think about it, Fish Tank doesn’t really have a storyline, its just a inside view to this girl’s life. On a more microscale, some of the camera shots are shaky, thus giving it the effect that it’s from a person’s point of view rather than being filmed, this involves the audience more as well.

I really enjoyed watching Wasp, even though it was a bit vulgar at times, this represented the realism of the film. I think that, even though there wasn’t a particular storyline, the plot developed because of the characters and also because you can imagine it happening in real life.

Danny Boyle

Danny Boyle is another famous directer that represents social realism as one of the main themes in the majority of his films. For example, Trainspotting.

Danny Boyle’s trainspotting is seeminly a more exaggurated version of reality, but the conventions are similar. Trainspotting is basically all about drugs and what ‘trips’ it takes you on, good and bad. It is a really disturbing film and it is really creepy!

Choose life. Choose a job. Choose a starter home. Choose dental insurance, leisure wear and matching luggage. Choose your future. But why would anyone want to do a thing like that?

The few other main films that Boyle has directed are:

  • Slumdog Millionare (2008)
  • Sunshine (2007)
  • Millions (2004)
  • 28 days later (2002)

Slumdog Millionare won the Acadamey Award for Best Picture in 2008, it gained a lot of attention because of the storyline and how it is based in real slums and also how it adresses racist attitudes etc.

Furthermore, the fact that an accomplished and well known Director was directing it, and also because it was so different to anything else he has directed before, let alone the fact that it was totally different to anything else on the market at that particular time meant that it gained even more attention that it would have done originally. Slumdog Millionaire is a huge social realism film. The whole story line is social realism and thats what makes it so hard hitting.

here is a film review from the Times newspaper:

Danny Boyle couldn’t have timed his resurrection as a populist director much better than this. Half the planet is desperate to enjoy a feel-good hit that doesn’t involve Abba songs.

The other half will be astonished by his chutzpah. Slumdog Millionaire is exactly the kind of exotic, edgy thriller that the new generation of Academy voters on both sides of the Pond absolutely adores. The rags-to-riches story is set in the grubby backstreets of Mumbai. Half the script is delivered in Hindi. And the plot is impossibly shallow.

The film starts at the end. Dev Patel’s 18-year-old Jamal is just one correct answer away from winning — or blowing — a 20 million rupee (£280,000) fortune on the Indian version of Who Wants to Be a Millionaire?

//

The handsome and terrified youth is an orphan from the gutters of Mumbai. Jamal’s unexpected success on the show over two intense days turns the stuttering youth into a national sensation.

When the programme breaks for the night before the all-important final question, Jamal is bundled through the back door of the television studio, whisked to the nearest police station, and beaten to a pulp by corrupt and jealous cops who want to know how he cheated. This is where the film actually begins.

“What the hell can a slum boy possibly know?” barks the irritated police chief (Irrfan Khan) as a plump minion clips a pair of electric cables to Jamal’s big toes. “The answers,” spits out Patel’s bruised hero. The plucky martyr reveals how each loaded question asked by the slimy host of Millionaire unlocks a seminal childhood injury.

This being a Danny Boyle movie the precious answers are nailed to brutal scenes. They involve frantic sprints through Mumbai’s crowded markets and grisly flashbacks to medieval slums where the nine-year-old Jamal, and his slightly older psychotic brother, Salim (Madhur Mittal), spend most of their childhood fleeing the clutches of sinister pimps and hungry gangs. It’s terribly Dickensian.

The fairytale power of the film is the way Boyle manages to capture the evolution of the city through the eyes of a child. It’s visually astonishing. The film gets under the skin of the city on every imaginable level. The cinematographer Anthony Dod Mantle is an insouciant genius with a camera. You could hang his lush stills of garbage heaps, frowning waifs and skeletal tower blocks in any respectable art gallery. By the same token the film must have been murder to edit.

Jamal’s shocks of growing up alone unfold like dreams: the death of his mother, murdered during a riot; a comic shaking of hands with a Bollywood legend, and then a long litany of ghastly wounds inflicted on fellow urchins by smiling pimps and lethal Fagins.

The rift between the sensitive Jamal and his increasingly domineering brother is the rip that hurts the most. The adolescent orphans barely understand the pain that they inflict on each other. Boyle uses this simmering tension to turn up the temperature at critical moments.

The director has never been shy of manipulating emotions and characters to crank out the maximum screen emotion. The scented backdrops and flavours of Mumbai dilute the crude liberties that Boyle occasionally inflicts on the melodrama.

The fact that these memories stack up into neat answers is spookily inconvenient if you’re a poisonous bastard such as Anil Kapoor’s deliciously smug television host. Or an emotionally detached viewer. Indeed Slumdog Millionaire is guilty of all sorts of implausible twists, not least a thundery long-distance romance between Jamal and a sultry captive beauty (Freida Pinto) forced into prostitution. It keeps pulling at your sleeve like a needy child.

Despite the wobbly structure, Slumdog is a far more sophisticated film than the plot suggests. There isn’t an inch of Merchant Ivory on view. And, like the best parables, Slumdog doesn’t simply plunder India’s troubled past and a boy’s bitter-sweet memories in order to look forward.

What’s great about the film is that it looks sideways as the past and future grind past each other like tectonic plates. It’s the kind of dynamic that Robert Lepage explores so brilliantly on stage. Here, Boyle takes on a bewildering mess of contradictions to make a surprisingly pure point.

Mumbai’s brand new skyscrapers sprout out of patches of mud; Jamal’s old-fashioned principles will forever be out of synch with the slick, nightclub world that his older brother Salim inhabits. And so it goes. The romance? Fear not. It’s fabulous icing.

15, 120 mins

Danny Boyle, like Shane Meadows uses film4 as one of his major film institutions. Trainspotting for example was a film4 film.

Film4 Productions is a British film production company owned by Channel 4. The company has been responsible for backing a large number of films made in the UK. The company’s first production was Walter, directed by Stephen Frears (1982).

Before 1998, the company was identified as Channel Four Films or FilmFour International. Later, the outfit was re-branded as FilmFour, to coincide with the launch of a new Digital TV channel of the same name. The company cut its budget and staff significantly in 2002, due to mounting losses, and was re-integrated into the drama department of Channel 4.


In what ways does your media product use, develop or challenge forms and conventions of real media products?

Our media product uses a lot of the typical conventions in terms of the Social Realism genre. Here is a short extract from KINOEYE BLOG:

June 16, 2007

British Cinema: Social Realism – Webliography

Social realism has played an important role in both British cinema and TV. The British documentary movement which developed under the leadership of John Grierson  was enormously influential in stimulating what became a strand of fiction film described as social realism.

Humphrey Jennings who started out with this movement brought a sense of the surreality of popular culture in everyday life to his work. His wartime docu-dramas and documentary work are exemplary pieces of art working across genres to produce some of the best work ever made by a British director.

Jennings was an inspiration to Lindsay Anderson and those who gathered around him in the British ‘Free Cinema’. Technical discoveries by cameraman Walter Lassally were to influence the work of the French New Wave Filmmakers and cinematographers. 

Free Cinema DVD from BFI
The idea behind social realism films being free really appeals to me, thus me wanting to take it further and make my own social realism products. Our product sets up the potential development of the social realism conventions suggesting that it is going to use them therefore suggesting to the audience that what they are about to watch is something similar to something like ‘This is England’ or ‘Dead Man’s shoes’.

One of the earliest social realism films was ‘Chapeav’ a russian film, here is some information on it from wikipedia.com:

Chapaev (Russian: Чапаев) is a 1934 Soviet film. It was directed by the Vasilyev brothers on Lenfilm. It is a story about Vasily Ivanovich Chapaev (1887-1919), a legendary Red Army commander who became a hero of the Russian Civil War. The plot is based on the novel of the same name by Dmitri Furmanov, a Russian writer and Bolshevik commissar who fought together with Chapayev.

Immediately upon the release (premiered on November 6, 1934 in Leningrad cinema theatre “Titan”) the film became one of the most popular creations in the history of Soviet cinema. Within the first year it was watched by 30 million people in the USSR alone.

It was awarded as “Best Foreign Film” by US National Board of Review in 1935 and Grand-Prix of Paris World Affair in 1937.

In a 1978 poll of cinema critics the film was considered one of the best 100 films in history.

After the release of the film, Chapaev and his assistants Petka and Anka became Russian folklore characters. This trio, together with their political commissar Furmanov, is present in a large number of Russian jokes.

it relates to social realism and used it as inspiration for the original plot of the film. It was deemed one of the best films in the last 100 years at that time.

A work in progress…

We eventually decided to use the lincolnshire countryside for our media products setting because some of the shots work particularly well with the lanes and trees in the background. For example,

The shot with our main ‘star’ (haha) William Rawdon, running down the lane works really well with the lane in the background, the sense of distance draws the viewer in. Furthermore, when editing, we washed this shot out so that it was more monochrome, thus making it work even better! We originally thought that using a more urban background would work well, like having Will running down the street and us filming his feet, however, I think that using the countryside as our setting works really well.

One of the other things that we thought worked really well whilst filming was the make-up that Odette did. We thought that there was a fine line between it looking fake and ridiculous between realistic and effective. Also, because we are aiming for our media product to fit into the ‘social realism’ genre, it really really had to look realistic, otherwise it would be a total flop. Furthermore, the make-up obviously suggests that he has been beaten up, and another thing that I like about it is that it creates questions in the audiences head. That’s why I am extremely pleased with the make up that Odette did for our product:

We tried to vary out shots whilst filming; we wanted it to be aesthetically pleasing and really intersting to watch, so when we found out that some of our footage got lost, we were absolutely gutted. However, we worked well with what we had and despite the many hiccups along the way, I think the over all thing is looking good! Some of the shots we used were photograhped, here is just a few:

At the end of the film, we needed something to bring it all together and trigger the imagination of the audience. That’s why we decided to include an ‘in memory of’ statement at the end of the cross dissolve in order for the storyline make sense. We thought in detail about whether we should have a voice over expanding more on this and we have decided to go with it. This is what the voice over says:

On the 25th of May, 2009, Merek Adamski became a victim of a racially motivated assault which left him with severe head injuries, later resulting in his death…This is his story.

We thought that voice overs work well with openings of films, its like an interior monologue and adresses the audience directly, making it seem like this story is just for them to see. It is in a way similar to the start of Resevoir Dogs.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lzMpH9jjo4w

Working the titles into our product took a lot of thinking about. We werent sure about whether we should have them coming up over the top of the footage, we tried that out, and it looked okay, but having washed out, monochrome footage and then red titles over the top conformed to the typical horror movie conventions as opposed to a social realism film.

Shane Meadow’s openings to so  many of his films are so simple, but so so so very effective. Here are just a few.

<object width=”480″ height=”385″><param name=”movie” value=”http://www.youtube.com/v/XL1_8ur5oKI&hl=en_GB&fs=1&”></param><param name=”allowFullScreen” value=”true”></param><param name=”allowscriptaccess” value=”always”></param><embed src=”http://www.youtube.com/v/XL1_8ur5oKI&hl=en_GB&fs=1&” type=”application/x-shockwave-flash” allowscriptaccess=”always” allowfullscreen=”true” width=”480″ height=”385″></embed></object>

<object width=”480″ height=”385″><param name=”movie” value=”http://www.youtube.com/v/ySZdlUSqvS8&hl=en_GB&fs=1&”></param><param name=”allowFullScreen” value=”true”></param><param name=”allowscriptaccess” value=”always”></param><embed src=”http://www.youtube.com/v/ySZdlUSqvS8&hl=en_GB&fs=1&” type=”application/x-shockwave-flash” allowscriptaccess=”always” allowfullscreen=”true” width=”480″ height=”385″></embed></object><object width=”480″ height=”385″><param name=”movie” value=”http://www.youtube.com/v/LMXYAtRImYk&hl=en_GB&fs=1&”></param><param name=”allowFullScreen” value=”true”></param><param name=”allowscriptaccess” value=”always”></param><embed src=”http://www.youtube.com/v/LMXYAtRImYk&hl=en_GB&fs=1&” type=”application/x-shockwave-flash” allowscriptaccess=”always” allowfullscreen=”true” width=”480″ height=”385″></embed></object>

Each of these films go straight into the action. Meadows is the major inspiration for the type of filming that I want to do. However, more Hollywood film directors such as Christopher Nolan inspire me so much as well. His film, ‘The Dark Knight’ ‘s opening is one of my favorite openings ever:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0OYBEquZ_j0

(Heath Ledger’s epic performance in this helps as well, ha!)

Obviously to get going with our film opening, we needed to do lots of planning and story boarding. WE had lots of ideas floating around as to what we wanted to do. We originally thought that we would have our main character running down a street, and having him chased by another group of lads, wanting to beat him up.  And then the screen would go black when the fist was coming right into his face.

We then decided that we could switch between the countryside and a more urban setting to create a contrast and an interest in the audience. This, in a round-about way is similar to that of horror films such as Dawn of The Dead and also 28 Weeks Later. They use the peaceful countryside in order to distract the audience from the horror that is happening within thus creating more tension; they don’t know what to expect.

This is the final time-line for our film opening. We wanted to include all of the relevant titles and not waste precious seconds out of the 2 minutes that we had with ones that we didn’t need. The music that we originally chose was- ‘drug police’ from the moby gratis website. However, due to the fact that we didnt hear anything from them soon enough, we looked deeper into what other music choices we could use. And luckily we found Andy Steele! Me and Odette both feel that this song is a lot better than the one that we originally chose; it fits the rhythm and pace of the film opening so much better.

When doing a story board, you can never really plan every single shot that you want. And what me and Odette found was that when we were actually doing our filming, we incorporated so many different shots in that we just randomly thought of on the spot and decided that, ooh, that might look good! The thing that I was most proud of when we were filming was the way that the countryside looked on camera, it came across extremely well.

 

who would be the audience for your product?

I think the audience for our product would be 15-40 year olds. The mature themes and violence that we would use in our film in order to put across the raw emotion and harshness that actually happens in these situations.

Obviously this would inhibit our audience, and it would mean that a large percentage would not (legally) be allowed to go to the cinema to watch this film, but I think if it didnt have the language, violence and mature themes that it needs, then it just wouldnt be the same film. The idea of social realism is that it represents situations realistically and this is key.

How did you attract/address your audience?

In our film, we really wanted to represent the ‘social/realism’ genre. At a more macro level, we reflected the conventions of this genre by washing out the colour in the majority of the shots- thus making it more monochrome, and also using close ups of the main character’s face to create impact. The make-up in these shots helped to create impact as well.

Also, the opening shot, the trees and then seeing a figure running towards the camera is endearing and attracts the audience straight away. Also, because this shot doesn’t conform to any typical conventions, it could mean that this is more interesting. Shane Meadows broke the rules and was the first director to represent the Midlands, me and miss odette rawdon could be the first to represent Lincolnshire!! Anyway, where was I? Oh yeah, the hard hitting first shot with the slow, sad piano music over the top works really well. It represents the mood of the opening scene and the overall storyline as a whole.

Unfortunately, I couldnt find his song to pop on my blog, so here is a delightful picture of his album cover instead:

The music emphasises the feel that we wanted to create, i’m really pleased with it, thanks Andy for letting us use your song!!

What kind of media institution might distribute your media product and why?

I think an institution like Shane Meadows film company would distribute our product; it reflects the realistic conventions that Meadows uses in all of his films. We used countryside as our setting because Meadows made it okay. Obviously, he is our main inspiration and I would like to think he would want to distribute our product.

How does your media product represent particular social groups?

our protagonist: JUAN GONCALVEZ

The idea of using a racial motivated attack as the main storyline really appealed to us; it is something that we really feel strongly about, however, we werent really sure how to go about it. So, in the end, we used a portugese name and at the end of the product wrote an ‘in memory of’ dedication and used a voice over over the top to make sure that the audience know that he died because of this.

We thought that by doing this, it would show that we were representing a particular social group.

We thought that because portugese people immigrate to Boston constantly and there is still tension, this would be perfect; not only does it represent realism, but it reflects what things are like in our area. This is an article taken from the Guardian newspaper on 23rd Jan 2006:

Portuguese in Boston, Lincolnshire

  • Digg it
  • Buzz up
  • Share on facebook
  • <!–Topsy–>Tweet this
  • The following correction was printed in the Guardian’s Corrections and clarifications column, Wednesday March 29 2006
    In the article below, we said that the Boston Target had been reported to the Commission for Racial Equality for instigating racial tension in the area. The Target has asked us to point out that the CRE took no action against it, and that the paper was also found not to have breached the editors’ code of practice by the Press Complaints Commission


    Estimated population 5,000

    First arrived 1996

    Centre Skirbeck and throughout Boston

    On Skirbeck Road, in south-east Boston, Lincs, there is a pub called The Volunteer. Inside, the bar has been built in the shape of a boat, and they sell delicious cakes and pastries alongside the drinks. The doorway is decorated with blue and white tiles depicting seafaring scenes, four windows are boarded up, another six are smashed, and the wall is covered in grimy splats and dribbles. This is Boston’s Portuguese pub.

    Now and again, some native Bostonians like to gather eggs and stones and drive past The Volunteer, hurling them as they pass. Portuguese, European and British flags have been stuck on the pub’s door, as if it might make a difference. In the poorer corners of rural Britain, this is how many immigrants still live – even the ones who are white, Christian and members of the EU.

    “Yeah, it’s regular,” says Vasco de Mello, The Volunteer’s 45-year-old owner, who has lived in Boston since 2001. “If I change the windows today, tomorrow they’ll be broken again.”

    Broken windows were the least of anyone’s worries in the summer of 2004. After England lost to France in the European championships, local youngsters rioted in the town centre, looting off-licences for bottles of spirits with which they torched two police cars. Police fought a long battle to keep the rioters away from Skirbeck Road.

    Then, 11 days later, when England lost to Portugal, The Volunteer was besieged for much of the night. Once again, it was only a cordon of riot police that kept them out. “The police do a very nice job,” says De Mello appreciatively. “They always look after us.” He talks about this as if it was just a part of normal life.

    “The feeling that I felt the first time I came here was that we were not welcome,” says De Mello’s assistant, Philip Sousa. “When I went to a shop, I felt like ET. Everybody goes, ‘Where do you come from?’ I felt less than a person.” Now 22, Sousa arrived in Boston three years ago, after the estate agent he worked for in Viseu, the capital of Portugal’s Dão wine region, went bust. He came here, after being told that he could find work in Boston, and then walked directly to The Volunteer. He’s been working for De Mello’s expanding empire – two pubs, a restaurant, a Portuguese food shop and a gang labour agency – ever since.

    “Accommodation is hard to find if you are Portuguese,” Sousa continues. “And even then, a friend of mine just rented a house and the neighbours complained to the police about his dog making lots of noise. But he never had a dog.” Looking at the neighbourhood, in which rows of houses display St George’s flags in their back gardens, and one even has its shed painted with a red and white cross, this is not hard to imagine.

    Most Bostonians, of course, are decent people. Their town is not an aberration; it is just old-fashioned and poor, with virtually no experience of immigration. At the last census, in 2001, there were 55,750 people living in Boston, among whom the largest non-white community was the Chinese, totalling 161 people. The town, in other words, is a reminder of what most of Britain used to be like. As it was for the Jamaicans in London 50 years ago, so it is for the Portuguese in Boston today, but with better policing.

    Things are improving, though. “Nowadays it’s quite good,” Sousa goes as far as to say. “I think the English are getting used to the Portuguese community.” And how about him? Is he getting used to England? “I like England,” he says. “I quite enjoy fish and chips. I enjoy English TV.” How about supporting Boston United? “That is another step,” De Mello interrupts.

    There is, of course, a good reason that thousands of Portuguese people have come to Boston: work, specifically gang labour, which is always plentiful. Mostly, this involves picking, grading, packing and preparing the nation’s supermarket food, the kind of honest but uninteresting work that only attracts those who really need it.

    Marco Moreira, 24, is from Porto. He began working for the Boston Potato Company three years ago, along with his parents, as part of De Mello’s gang. Like many Portuguese, he has now moved on to a permanent contract, driving a forklift truck for £5.50 an hour. He works from 6am to 2pm each day, shifting endless piles of Vivaldi potatoes – “the potato for all seasons”, but better known as a Sainsbury’s premium white.

    “My country at the moment is no good,” says Moreira. “The factories are closing, there is no money. So I changed countries because I wanted a good life, a new life.” Does he plan to stay? “No, no, because it’s not my country,” he answers immediately. “Just make some money and go back to Portugal again.” He laughs at this for some reason, but not bitterly. And what would he do back in Portugal? “Open a bar.” In Porto? “Yes, my city.” This is spoken with wistful pride.

    Moreira twirls his machine impressively around the loading bay, where several Sainsbury’s trucks are waiting. Moving potatoes and saving money may not be the most thrilling way to spend one’s early 20s, but he seems confident that better times are ahead. How about the locals, have they been unwelcoming? “A little,” he concedes. “Not in my job, where everybody talks to me and I talk to them, but outside. Sometimes I pass someone in the street and they will follow me and say, ‘Go back to your country.'” Is he not worried that they will attack him? “No, because I don’t answer.”

    “People are ignorant,” says factory manager Matthew Nunn. “They don’t realise that Marco is here legally, paying all his taxes, staying in a house where he pays council tax. He goes and buys clothes and food locally, so he’s contributing to the community, too. And he’s creating jobs for other people. Without these guys, we wouldn’t have been able to expand to where we are now.”

    Moreira has an enlightened employer in the Boston Potato Company, which provides free English lessons at Boston college for all employees, but many do much worse. “I used to work in a factory where we were forbidden from speaking our language,” says Ligia Ferreira from Lisbon. Ferreira first came to Boston because she wanted to travel around Europe. She shared a room with two other women, but tells me there were 12 in the men’s bedroom.

    “At first it was OK because we didn’t have any major issues,” she says, “but then some people were using drugs – heavy stuff – and it became quite difficult because we couldn’t lock our bedroom. You used to go to work and you wouldn’t know if you would still have things in your bedroom when you came back home. And I couldn’t open a bank account, so I had to keep all my money with me. We didn’t have a kitchen either. Some factories had a canteen, so we used to eat there, or just had loads of chocolates and Red Bull.” These days, she says, few Portuguese have to live like this.

    The community’s problems have attracted plenty of comment, little of it sympathetic. “The local press instigated a lot of the tension,” says Ferreira, singling out the Boston Target, whose letters page has previously been referred to the Commission for Racial Equality by the Lincolnshire Racial Equality Council. And a TV reporter even showed up in Boston last year. “She posed as wanting to do a positive programme about why migrant workers come here,” says Ferreira with a sigh, “and in the end the programme was all about how Portuguese people sell false IDs to Brazilian people.”

    Ferreira now has a good job at the city library, establishing relationships with Boston’s new communities, and lives in the town with her boyfriend and young daughter. In her work, she regularly sees cases of families brought over to Britain by the promise of work, and then abandoned. They have no job, no home, no idea what to do next, and no English with which to find out, so they end up at the library talking to her. The situation is improving, she says, although Ferreira herself is still shouted at on the street – the last time was a week ago. A close friend was also badly beaten in his own block of flats because he had a foreign accent. “This might seem ridiculous to you, but it happens in Boston. It’s normal.” She sighs, angry but resigned. “I have to be optimistic, otherwise I might as well give up my job now”.

    Looking back at the preliminary task, what do you feel you have learnt in the progression from it to the full product?

    Looking back on the initial task that we did, I think my greatest improvement has been my development in confidence with the technology that we use. For example, getting to grips with the apple mac and the final cut express.

    Why did I struggle in the first place?

    • I’d never used them before so was not sure what I was doing or how on earth I was supposed to go about doing those things!
    • Working with a bunch of new people meant that I was still sussing people out and getting comfortable within the class as a whole.
    • I had never ever done anything like this before.The preliminary task was a really good team bonding exercise and I think I developed a special bond with Odette. We worked together in the preliminary task and then went on to work with eachother in the Film opening task also.

    How have I overcome these problems?

    • I now know how to use Final cut express because we were on it practically every single day trying to get our film opening done, therefore we learnt so many more things by actually doing it ourselves. For example, reducing the saturation of the camera shots, using the cross face, slowing the shots down, speeding the shots up and also playing music over the top and even adding in little voice over means that my knowledge of Final Cut is NO LONGER LIMITED!!
    • Looking back ono my preliminary task has made me realise just how awful it is. Furthermore, looking back on my film opening, I can recognise my mistakes so fingers crossed, next year, my music video or my short film will have less mistakes and be of much higher quality.

    Another thing that I think that I have learnt in the transition from preliminary to film opening is the more technical side to things such as the differentiation between genres and the traditional conventions that media products stick to. Before I got fully involved in this course, I didnt think about how certain shots represented certain things, I just thought producers did it because it looked good! (well, not quite as blunt as that.)But, now I know that close up shots for example, show intimacy and represent emotion:

    and how establishing shots, well…establish shots.

    What have you learnt about technologies from the process of constructing this product?

    Using this kind of tecnology was new to me this year and I think becoming comfortable and confident with it was harder than the whole filming process!! This was the camera that we used and we came across a few difficulties such as the camera shaking for example. However, this task proved to be a learning curve and the next feature that we make will (fingers crossed) come without these issues. We had to mae sure that we pressed the red record button a few seconds before we started shooting so that it gave us plenty of material to edit and play around with. We learnt this through the preliminary task; editing that proved to be difficult because we didnt have enough  material.

    Furthermore, working with the Apple Macs for (only) the second time, meant that my knowledge of them was slightly limited and we were not entirely sure what every single button meant! However, as the task went on, we gradually learnt more and more about how they worked. (I just have to say that the keyboard with these computers are so  much cooler then with the traditional computer!)

    As previously mentioned, at the start of the year, working with these computers seemed like a daunting task; they are so totally different to the microsoft computers. For example, if you want to copy and paste a picture you have to press Apple, Shift and 4! I  mean what the heck? However, once you get used to all the short cuts and sneaky little button combo’s working with these computers is a lot of fun!

    The editing programme on the Apple Mac- ‘final cut express’ was sp overwhelmingly high tec at the start of the year, however, now that we have edited our film openings on them, we have come to understand it more and feel sooo much more confident using it.

    This is the small logo that sits at the bottom of the screen that represents ‘final cut express’.

    « Older entries